US
Supermall
B-1/104, Paschim Vihar,
New Delhi-110063 India
Tel : 01142316457, 9810571993
Website : ukmall.net
Undigested
The real image of Indian Administration
DoctorKC solicits legal protection/assistance, grant from
NGOs and benevolent organisations, in fight against corruption and issues
featured at ukmall.net/undigested/spam /police /insight /ismart . The object
is to give direction to decades long blind fight which failed to yield
any results. DoctorKC would be ready to devote time and energy, but no
money - not even on paper work! http://ukmall.net/doctorkc.
Mobile 9810571993
DoctorKC relished fighting alone. Now at 68 years age,
anticipating escalated litigation costs, he requires assistance.
Except by post, only webmaster can be contacted by email.
Are others approachable through touts only?
02 October 2012
I discarded damaged Pancard no. AELPC3116L, procured
through a chartered account, in the name KRISHAN CHAUDHRY and reprint cannot
be issued as I don't have VALID identity documents with that name.
I also hold Pancard no. AAGHK2818E in the name KRISHAN
CHAUDHRY HUF, obtained through a chartered account. If that is lost, I
am sure I cannot obtain reprint through direct application, in absence
of VALID identity documernts with that name. Would dishonourable Manmohan
Singh and P Chitandram check up how much bribe was charged for issue of
two pancards, in absence of VALID indentity documents?
02 October 2012
Manmohan Singh - Gangotri of every scam in India - harvests
money from trees planted at NDSL.
Some decades ago, a chartered account applied for Pancard
and one with number AELPC3116L was issued.
One day, I found pancard split into three layers and
I did not preserve any portion.
Then, I applied online for reprint. With my documents
already on record, why should NDSL require any document at all?
All my identity documents bear name KRISHAN CHAND CHAUDHRY
and Dr K Chaudhry. Why was original pancard issued in name KRISHAN CHAUDHRY,
when I presumably paid bribe through CA?
Why should NDSL refuse same documents with unmatching
name, in absence of bribe.
They rejected my application thrice with different objections.
Why can't they list all objections at first instance?
I paid fee for same service twice. Third time, Shri Pradeep
02240904624 advised me to submit application with FAKE payment info and
quote payments already made. (Acknowledgement no. 881030206790941, 881030207444800).
That contention is rejected by NDSL and payment is required by NDSL. What
is the status and jurisdiction of Shri Pradeep 02240904624 in advising
me as above.
NOW I SHALL NOT SUBMIT FRESH APPLICATION
WITH OR WITHOUT PAYMENT. I WANT PANCARD REPRINT WITH NAME KRISHAN CHAUDHRY
- NOT UNDER CHANGED NAME.
02 October 2012
Dear Sir / Madam,
This is with reference to your
PAN Application made vide
Acknowledgement no. 881010207639100. In this context,
please note that we
have observed following discrepancy(ies) in your application.
1) Proof of AADHAAR is not provided for the AADHAAR mentioned
in the application
- We request you to kindly submit a copy of AADHAAR
allotment letter issued to you by UIDAI.
2) We are yet to receive payment for application.
- Kindly e-mail Cheque /DD no. and date on which
amount has been debited from your account at TIN_Online@nsdl.co.in
3) Address page has not been attached with the passport.
- Submit passport along with the address page
I reiterate that requirement of
documents is IRRELEVANT to request for Pancard reprint and interacting
staff is implanted in NDSL just to ensure availability of Pancard through
touts only.
Aadhar Card number, if any - in
application amply implies that Aadhar Card is not manadatory. You are demanding
it only to harass me and force me to apply through a tout. A copy is attached.
I may also be printed at http://ukmall.net/images/certificates/adhaarcard.jpg
Address page of passport being
sent.
After paying for same service TWICE,
Shri Pradeep 02240904624 advised me to submit application with FAKE payment
info and quote payments already made. (Acknowledgement no. 881030206790941,
881030207444800). In demanding payment for third time, are you disputing
staus and jurisdiction of Shri Pradeep 02240904624 advising me submit FAKE
payment info and quote payments already made for same service.
KRISHAN CHAUDHRY
12 October 2012
Dear Sir/Madam,
Certain discrepancy(ies) has/have been noticed in the
details submitted by you in your application for ?New PAN Card or Change/Correction
in PAN Data?, as compared with details available with Income Tax Department.
Please find attached an annexure, which describes discrepancy(ies)
in detail.
For any clarification, call us on 020-27218080 or mail
us at tininfo@nsdl.co.in
To know the status of your PAN application via SMS, type
?NSDLPAN <space> 15 digit Acknowledgement Number? and send it to 57575.
E.g. PAN 010121200001222.
Documents should be sent to:-
1. The application for Pancard no.
AELPC3116L was submitted through a chartered account, presumably with bribe.
I don't have any identity document with name KRISHAN CHAUDHRY, as on card.
2. I require reprint of pancard.
No documents should be required for that purpose. Because of incompetence
and corruption of NDSL staff, documents were demanded and submitted. In
case my contention is upheld, the documents should be ignored and reprint
issued with name KRISHAN CHAUDHRY.
3. KRISHAN is first name, CHAND
second name, CHAUDHRY the surname. Hence KRISHAN CHAUDHRY should be construed
as bonafide variant of KRISHAN CHAND CHAUDHRY, with second name omitted.
Also the pancard and ITD data for pancard AELPC3116L have my photograph,
which may be tallied with application.
KRISHAN CHAND CHAUDHRY
KRISHAN CHAUDHRY
Dr K Chaudhry
13 September 2012
Email from tin@tinonapp2.nsdl.co.in
Dear Sir / Madam,
This is with reference to your
PAN Application made vide
Acknowledgement no. 881030207444800. In this context,
please note that we
have observed following discrepancy(ies) in your application.
1) Name in Proof of Identity does not contain first name
in expanded form as mentioned in application.
- Submit proof of identity where name in application
exactly matches with name in proof.
2) The name mentioned in the application does not exactly
match with the name in the Proof of Communication Address.
- Submit proof of address where name in application
exactly matches with name in proof.
My reply
Acknowledgement no. 881030207444800
Hi!
A photocopy of passport was sent with application.
Passport has
First name : KRISHAN
Second name : CHAND
Sirname : CHAUDHRY
ALSO I feel the objection is irrelevant to Pancard Reprint
request and strongly protest against such HARASSMENT.
Identity document is attached and also viewable at http://ukmall.net/images/certificates/identity.jpg
Rejoinder
Manmohan Singh - Gangotri of every scam in India - runs
Pancard scams too!
ACKNOWLEDGMENT NUMBER:881030206790941
You sent me email to pay fee again.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT NUMBER: 881030207444800
With same problem, you have not demanded repayment.
That is a sample of your HIGH HEADED ATTITUDE.
Please refund Rs106 paid by me second time.
10 September 2012
https://tin.tin.nsdl.com/pan/GuidelinesCorr.html
- Only a DUFFER can include red text below in an address:-
Write to: INCOME TAX PAN SERVICES UNIT (Managed
by National Securities Depository Limited), 3rd floor, Sapphire
Chambers, Near Baner Telephone Exchange, Baner, Pune - 411045
September 05, 2012
The Union Finance Minister
Subject : Pancards issued
through touts only
Esteemed Sir
My pancard no. AELPC3116L
was sleeping comfortably in a drawer when I found it split into three layers.
Somehow, I did not care to preserve split components. Virtually surrounded
by unsolicited SMS/emails from touts and advertisements on poles/gates,
I opted for a bonafide way - online application ACKNOWLEDGMENT NUMBER:
881030206790941.
I found and opted for option
- Reprint Pancard. The option vanished on next screen and I had to resume
with Modification option.
I have property papers,
driving licence, bank accounts in name - Dr K Chaudhry. I entered name
as KRISHAN CHAUDHRY and name to printed as Dr K Chaudhry. The suffix Dr
was nowhere banned in the application form.
I did not receive any response
through post/courier/email. After many days, I checked up online and found
my desired display name as invalid and a link to proceed further. Surprisingly,
I found a new form with new acknowledgment number. As I filled up and submitted
the form, I was taken to payment page. I struggled for some time to find
the way out but could not. Then I emailed my query. In response, I was
told to resubmit identity documents and also pay again.
I only require reprint of
a damaged card. Why shouldn't they use display name as on my original card?
In case my desired display
name is invalid, why should I be made to resubmit identity documents and
pay again for the same service?
It appears the system cannot
run without tout. The direct applicants are made to may Rs106 several times
before they approach a tout.
Regards
Yours faithfully
(Dr K Chaudhry)
B-1/104 Paschim Vihar,
New Delhi-110063
Mobile: 9810571993 ukmall.net/doctorkc
Copy to : PM, Media
Save Acknowledment script link does not work in
Firefox and Opera. If you pay Rs106 and printer is not around, your money
is forfeited. Why don't they send link in email for printing later at any
time.
Also, if your send acknowldgment after 15 days,
payment stands forfeited.
Acknowledgment for Request for New PAN Card or/and Changes or Correction
in PAN Data
No communication sent to
applicant. Information available only online. Applicant cannot talk to
any one!
Can any scholar of english
language make out what the following implies?
020 - 27218080 is a
dummy number parroting recorded voice only. UTITSL Support Desk at 022-
6793 1287 keeps parroting - Please hold, the operator will be with you
shortly - incurring call cost Rs100 with no one around to listen. Documents
in image below were sent with application.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have not yet received
the supporting documents with respect to your application for 'New PAN
Card or/and Changes or Correction in PAN Data'. Kindly submit the requisite
documents to NSDL to enable us to process your PAN application at the earliest.
For further details, please read the guidelines and instructions or contact
TIN Call Center at 020 - 27218080
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For sending reprint to
registered address, why should any supporting document be required?
Bribe Or Visit Again!
During 1978 an ITO Agarwal
summoned me to Hisar for assessment. I was apprehensive about systems at
metro city and preferred to keep my file at Hisar itself. However, too
learned officer directed me to revisit Hisar after a week, with an application
to transfer the file to Delhi. He refused to accept such application at
the same session and also my contention to send such application by registered
post. Obviously, I had been penalised for not going in for bribed assessment.
A person practising medicine without
holding requisite qualification is termed a quack. If that definition applies
to other fields, I have been practising quackery in too many. Let us take
an instance of law. The file mentioned in the above instance was eventually
transferred to Delhi and income tax assessed. Just about zero % serious
and fully willing to pay Rs2000 tax with any penalties, I drafted an appeal,
affixed 50 paise court fee stamp and sent the same by ordinary
post.
After a few months, I appeared before Assistant Commissioner and the reverred
Sardarji accepted my appeal. When confronted with ITO for compliance of
the appeallate order, the ITO demanded the proof of my contention. I pleaded,
"Sir, during assessment I produced every document you desired and I could
produce. Now this is not the stage at which proof can be demanded. My contention
of omission in the order has already been upheld and I just want compliance."
The ITO just stared at me and directed me to run away with refund. Subsequently,
I filed appeals - quite seriously - in another IT assessment (appeal upheld
by an extremely polite and sweet sardarni ji) and in wealth tax assessment
(order was beyond my knowledge of English. The appeal was stated to be
only
technically upheld - I did not pay tax and
no one questioned me or demanded tax for three decades - obviously the
order words too complicated for other WTO's too). All the three appeals
were upheld without any professional aid. I overenthusiastically announced
that I could find bonafide faults with most IT assessment orders. I was
quite sure I was entitled to represent others, without any qualification/registration,
just as I would represent my wife - I did not implement my thoughts, however.
With appointments and postings sold on Cash & Carry basis, most ITO's
do not know how to draft income tax orders. The
information may be stunning but many ITO's and STO's gather conventional
bribe, dispose of the file. Along with assessment order they also give
COOPERATING receptionist or secretary - anticrime agencies refuse to recognise
it as a part of sex trade.
With compliments from
Dr K Chaudhry
Global Malls
B-1/104, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi-110063
Tel : 42316457, 9810571993
